Strengthening National Character through Literacy: STPHBK and Kayuh Literasi Collaboration
Abstract
Background: Low literacy levels in communities contribute to broader social issues, including school dropout rates, limited workforce skills, and intergenerational poverty. Strengthening family-based literacy is essential to support character development and improve quality of life.
Aims: This community service program aims to enhance literacy awareness among parents, improve the capacity of Taman Bacaan Masyarakat (TBM) tutors, and foster children’s literacy skills as a foundation for character building.
Methods: This program employed a community development approach with an empowerment strategy, involving collaboration between lecturers, students, and the Kayuh Literasi community. The implementation consisted of three stages: (1) raising parents’ awareness through seminars and literacy workshops, (2) mentoring TBM tutors in designing engaging and leveled literacy activities, and (3) assessing children’s literacy skills using leveled reading books. Data were collected through observation and program documentation and analyzed descriptively.
Result: The results indicate an improvement in parents’ understanding of their role in supporting literacy at home, increased creativity and competence of tutors in developing literacy activities, and positive changes in children’s reading motivation and abilities. The program also demonstrated the effectiveness of collaborative efforts between higher education institutions, literacy communities, and families in promoting literacy culture.
Conclusion: The implementation of a community-based literacy program through a community development and empowerment approach effectively strengthens literacy awareness and practices among families and communities. This program offers a sustainable and replicable model for fostering literacy culture and character development.
Full text article
References
Agusti, R. S., Lubis, S., & Suliyanthini. (2014). Analisis tingkat pendidikan dan angka putus sekolah di Kecamatan Babakan Madang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembangunan, 12(2), 45–56.
Auerbach, E. R. (1989). Toward a social-contextual approach to family literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.2.h237r60025146807
Bathororesi, M. (2016). Pengembangan kawasan kota mandiri Sentul City dan implikasinya terhadap perubahan sosial ekonomi masyarakat. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 27(1), 35–47.
Bus, A. G., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065001001
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Gavcar, E. (2024). Parental influence and children’s digital behavior: A study on social interaction and learning outcomes. Journal of Child Development Studies, 18(1), 55–70.
Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5th ed.). Routledge.
Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362
Islami, R., et al. (2024). Intergenerational literacy and social mobility: Evidence from developing regions. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, 102745.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. ACTA Publications.
Ledwith, M. (2016). Community development in action: Putting Freire into practice. Policy Press.
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Over, H. (2012). The role of social norms in imitation. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00210.x
Over, H. (2013). From imitation to cultural learning: Social motivations and cognitive processes. Developmental Science, 16(5), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12063
Rahmi, D., & Adry, M. (2018). Pengaruh tingkat pendidikan terhadap kemiskinan dan kriminalitas. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 16(1), 45–58.
Rogers, A. (2003). What is the difference? A new critique of adult learning and teaching. NIACE.
Ruri. (2024). Social environment and digital behavior in children’s learning development. Journal of Educational Psychology Research, 12(1), 1–15.
Sarkar, S. (2025). Social connectedness and behavioral engagement in learning environments. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 14(1), 22–39.
Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2014). Continuity and change in the home literacy environment. Child Development, 85(4), 1552–1568. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12222
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
Srh. (2023). Laporan kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat Kecamatan Babakan Madang. Pemerintah Kabupaten Bogor.
Street, B. V. (2014). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. Routledge.
UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021. UNESCO Publishing.
World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Yudha Aviratri, Abdul Wahab Nafiyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.